Re: spu-candidates / opsu-candidates
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:22:58AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> [2009-03-11 01:57]:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:58:04PM +0000, nion@alioth.debian.org wrote:
> > > Author: nion
> > > Date: 2009-03-10 13:58:03 +0000 (Tue, 10 Mar 2009)
> > > New Revision: 11367
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > > data/CVE/list
> > > data/spu-candidates.txt
> > > Log:
> > > - spu notifications
> >
> > We should likely re-organise to ospu-candidates and spu-candidates
> > to avoid confusion for maintainers and better tracking?
>
> Yes I agree. Do you have any better idea apart from using
> two files?
I think two files are the best solution, since it allows us to dump
the issues completely once a suite runs out of maintenance.
Cheers,
Moritz
Reply to: