On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:40:29 -0500 Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:19:45 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Please fix these inconsistencies. > > thanks for your hawk eyes. You're welcome! :-) [...] > i don't mind making the necessary fixes, so > please keep reporting. I am happy to hear this! [...] > thanks again for the reports. the problems should be fixed now. Yes, I can confirm that all the inconsistencies are now fixed. Thank you very much for your quick reaction! > please > continue to send em in. accuracy is important. Good! As soon as I find the time to do so, I will go through the "squeeze is born" inconsistencies again and report which ones are still relevant: http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-tracker/2009/02/msg00008.html Obviously enough, if you (or anyone else!) are willing to fix some of them in the meanwhile, it would be highly appreciated! ;-) Thanks again (and please keep me in Cc: if you reply). -- On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND "nano-documents" may lead you to my website... ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp6JF9FfTPzl.pgp
Description: PGP signature