[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CVE-2008-2380 vs. tracker



On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:22:17 +0100 Steffen Joeris wrote:

> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:30:39 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Or should the CVE be marked as fixed in sid, too?
> I wasn't aware of the new dak feature on ftp-master that uploads to 
> testing-security, which are newer than the unstable version get put into 
> unstable as well.

That seems to be a useful feature!

> I've marked it as fixed in sid now as well.

Good, just checked.

[...]
> > P.S.: Please Cc: me on replies, as I am not a list subscriber.  Thanks.
> You appear to be a regular, so why not subscribing? ;)

You are not far from truth: I must think about it...  ;-)

> Also Moritz offered you commit access to the tracker, do you have any 
> intention to follow up on it?

I think I already replied to that offer:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-tracker/2008/12/msg00033.html

> Feel free to query me on IRC, if you want to 
> discuss this further (nick "white").

I am quite busy right now...
Anyway, "on IRC" is a bit vague: which server and which channel?


-- 
 On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND
 "nano-documents" may lead you to my website...  
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpyaOfVCDu5h.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: