[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: geshi vs. tracker



On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:47:39 +0100 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:

> * Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> [2008-12-04 22:33:24 CET]:
> > On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:18:03 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
[...]
> > > It's not yet moved to testing, the tracker tracks regular lenny.
> > 
> > Sorry, I am not sure I understand what you mean: I expected to see two
> > rows in the source package table.  Something like:
> > 
> >   Source Package   Release           Version           Status
> >   geshi (PTS)      lenny             1.0.7.22-1        vulnerable
> >                    lenny (security)  1.0.7.22-1+lenny1 fixed
> > 
> > A similar table may be seen in previous DTSAs, e.g:
> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/DTSA-174-1
> 
>  You are right. The testing-security indexes seems to have been
> outdated. Florian did a forced update of the indexes and it's now like
> you expected to see it. :)

I've just checked, everything seems to be fine now.

> 
>  Thanks for the notice.

Thanks to you all, for fixing things up and for enhancing Debian
security!

Bye.

-- 
 On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND
 "nano-documents" may lead you to my website...  
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpg86LHVLhTy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: