Hi Steffen, * Steffen Joeris <steffen.joeris@skolelinux.de> [2008-09-09 18:10]: > On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:14:28 pm Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Mon, September 8, 2008 13:09, white@alioth.debian.org wrote: > > > Regression fixed in wordnet > > > > > > - - wordnet 1:3.0-12 (medium; bug #497441) > > > + - wordnet 1:3.0-13 (medium; bug #497441) > > > > Since the regression doesn't have security implications, wouldn't it be > > more accurate to keep the fixed-version at 1:3.0-12? > I thought about it as well, but if I recall correctly, we have always treated > regressions (also the ones that just introduced normal bugs) like this. > But I might be off here, so if you are sure go ahead and revert it. I disagree, as I already wrote in the bug report 1:3.0-12 includes all security fixes and I don't think we should track issues in corner case use cases as they might pop out way later than the issue was fixed. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Attachment:
pgpy8IXHzP3jX.pgp
Description: PGP signature