On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:25:16 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > On Friday 25 July 2008 01:07, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > I think I've noticed another DSA with tracker inconsistencies. > > > > > DSA-1615-1 [1] claims that several CVEs are fixed in > > > > > xulrunner/1.9.0.1-1 for sid. On the other hand, most of these CVEs > > > > > (which are linked from the DSA tracker page [2]) are not reported as > > > > > fixed in > > > > > xulrunner/1.9.0.1-1 by the tracker. [...] > I am *not* talking about etch, I am talking about *sid*! > > The DSA claims that the CVEs are fixed in unstable, while the tracker > says that unstable is still vulnerable (as far as most of the mentioned > CVEs are concerned). > This seems to be an inconsistency: either the DSA is wrong or the > tracker needs to be updated... Can someone please fix this? -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs The nano-document series is here! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp2quMxW7zpA.pgp
Description: PGP signature