Hi Francesco, * Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> [2008-06-14 16:02]: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:36:18 +0200 Nico Golde wrote: > > * Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> [2008-06-14 12:37]: > > > I see from the list archive that the CUPS renaming got the attention it > > > deserves. Unfortunately, it seems that the security tracker now lists > > > several old vulnerabilities as fixed in package cups, but unfixed in > > > package cupsys: > > [...] > > Mhm, maybe the reason is that cupsys was not yet removed > > from unstable and currently cupsys and cups are installable > > in unstable? > > I should shut up, since I don't know how this "<removed>" tag is > supposed to work with the security tracker, but... even when cupsys is > removed from unstable, it will be still present in testing for some > time, and in testing-security until deleted (see bug #464045), and in > stable until lenny is released, and then in oldstable for one further > year... > This is why I thought the fixed version information should have been > *copied* from cupsys to cups, rather than *moved*. > > Or am I completely off-track? No sounds reasonable to me. Florian? Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Attachment:
pgp0_ghXj7m1W.pgp
Description: PGP signature