[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Tracker inconsistencies for iceape?



On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:01:58 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:

> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-1095
> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-2292
> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-3511
> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-5334
> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-5337
> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-5338
> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-5339
> > http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-5340
> 
> Fixed.

Err, what about
http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-5337
and
http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-5340
?

-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
 Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpfnS5VczV19.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: