Hi, On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Me too, but they seem to be for different use-cases. Tag2upload uploads > things into the archive, Debusine build packages. FWIW, there's a discussion at https://salsa.debian.org/freexian-team/debusine/-/issues/815 about making both cooperate a bit better. > I never had a big > problem getting packages built, Salsa CI does it nicely for me, so I'm > waiting for some use-case for Debusine. Doing reverse builds may be > one, but I just noticed that Salsa CI added this functionality. So I'm > not really sure what I would use Debusine for really. Package building is just the tip, it's the QA that matters. And debusine runs autopkgtest on your reverse dependencies, something that Salsa CI doesn't offer. And we will soon finish a regression tracking feature so that you can quickly see whether a QA failure is new or not (compared to the version present in the target release). We are also generating debdiff (for source and binary packages) so that can make your job as reviewer/sponsor easier. Another upcoming feature is package repository so that you can prepare multiple updates and upload them all at once to the target release (once they are ready). Cheers, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature