[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: regripper needs source-obnly upload



Dear Eriberto,

thank you very much for your effort!

The .debdiff including the updates by the Janitor bot looks fine to me.
I totally agree to bring it to bookworm and then include the (minor)
upstream changes at a later time.

If there is anything on which I could/should work in that regard, please
let me know.

Thanks again for the upload!

Best regards,
   Jan

On 12/9/22 15:36, Eriberto wrote:
> Hi again Jan,
> 
> Em sex., 9 de dez. de 2022 às 03:14, Jan Gru <j4n6ru@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>> Dear Eriberto,
>>
>> thank you very much for your message.
>>
>> Sorry, I thought that Arnaud's source-only upload resolved this already.
> 
> Yes, but is not possible to replace a revision already in Debian using
> the same revision number.
> 
>> In my opinion, it is perfectly fine to upload the package as it is since
>> there are only very minor changes on upstream (i.e., just a few smaller
>> commits as far as I can tell).
> 
> Right. The main intent now is to make the regripper available for Bookworm.
> 
>> Do you want me to prepare anything or would you just upload the package
>> (after bumping the version number)?
> 
> If you agree, I could make a new upload with a new revision number. I
> attached a debdiff. If you prefer, send me a similar package and I
> will upload it.
> 
> I noticed that there are changes from Debian Janitor already committed
> in Salsa. I will include them. Now, it is no longer needed to declare
> 'Upload source-only'. Please, see the debdiff.
> 
>> Thank you very much for keeping an eye on this and your help!
> 
> You're welcome.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Eriberto
> 
>> Best regards,
>>    Jan
>>
>>
>> On 12/8/22 18:56, Eriberto wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> Do you have any news? What do you think about I send a source-only
>>> upload to Debian, without any change? This action will make the
>>> regripper available for Debian 12 Bookworm.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Eriberto
>>>
>>>
>>> Em sáb., 26 de nov. de 2022 às 03:28, Jan Gru <j4n6ru@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Eriberto,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for pointing this out. I packaged `regripper' intially, and there
>>>> is no issue with it, as far as I could tell. The package was reviewed by
>>>> Samuel and Arnaud. Finally, it was kindly sponsored by Raphael Hertzog
>>>> in October 2021 [0].
>>>>
>>>> Given that I can't do uploads, is there anything I could or should do
>>>> about this issue?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>     Jan
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> [0]
>>>> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1267101/accepted-regripper-30git2021040505ef957dfsg1-1-source-all-into-unstable-unstable/
>>>>
>>>> On 11/25/22 20:39, Eriberto Mota wrote:
>>>>> Hi team,
>>>>>
>>>>> regripper (sponsored in 2021) needs a source-only upload to migrate do
>>>>> testing. Is there any problem not known by everyone that is blocking
>>>>> this upload?
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed this issue when updating forensics-all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Eriberto
>>>>>

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x51D46EFAF99AF11F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: