[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New version of openvas renamed to gvm



Hi SZ,

Yes please upload your current work and I will try to finish the packaging.

Thanks,
Sophie

Le 10/12/2019 à 11:43, SZ Lin (林上智) a écrit :
> Hi Sophie,
> 
> 
> After two weeks later, I still have little time on upgrading openvas to gvm.
> 
> I plan to upload current work to a temporary repository, and you can
> take over the packaging task if you are interested.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> SZ
> 
> SZ Lin (林上智) <szlin@debian.org> 於 2019年11月21日 週四 下午10:30寫道:
> 
>>
>> Hi Sophie,
>>
>> Sophie Brun <sophie@freexian.com> 於 2019年11月20日 週三 下午6:42寫道:
>>>
>>> Hi SZ,
>>>
>>> I would like to see openvas updated. I can work on the updates. But maybe you start
>>> to work on the new versions?
>>
>> Yes, I'm working on that, but the task behind the expected schedule
>> due to hectic months.
>>
>> I will be available to restart the packaging task after this week.
>>
>>>
>>> Do you think we should keep the current git repo to keep the history and change
>>> the git repo name with source package name?
>>
>> Yes, I think it makes sense. As you know, it's not the first time
>> changing the name in openvas.
>>
>> SZ
>>
>>> Or should we create new git repo?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards,
>>> Sophie
>>>
>>> Le 16/05/2019 à 13:30, SZ Lin (林上智) a écrit :
>>>> Hi Team,
>>>>
>>>> Since "openvas" project renamed to "gvm" [1], I proposed below changes
>>>> for adopting new version of "gvm" (a.k.a."openvas")
>>>>
>>>> * openvas -> gvm (and openvas will become transition package [2])
>>>> * openvas-libraries 9.0.0 -> gvm-libs 10.0.0
>>>> * openvas-scanner 6.0.0 (not changed)
>>>> * openvas-manager 7.0.0 -> gvmd 8.0.0
>>>> * greenbone-security-assistant 7.0.0 -> gsa 8.0.0
>>>> * openvas-cli 1.4.5 (abandoned) -> gvm-tools 2.0.0
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to add any input or suggestions.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/greenbone
>>>> [2] https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> SZ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> 


Reply to: