[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 2nd REMINDER: tomb 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1 ready for review and upload



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Eriberto,

Am Freitag, den 13.12.2019, 19:31 -0300 schrieb Eriberto:
> Hi Sven,
> 
> Sorry, sorry, sorry... I was a bit busy in last days and I didn't see
> your last message asking for an upload.

I already estimated something like this :-)

> 
> I just uploaded tomb to bpo.
> 
> Please, let me know if you need more uploads.

Thank you for uploading, nothing more in my queue at the moment.

Cheers,
Sven

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Eriberto
> 
> 
> Em sex., 13 de dez. de 2019 às 18:00, Sven Geuer
> <debmaint@g-e-u-e-r.de> escreveu:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> > 
> > Hi Team,
> > 
> > I'd really appreciate if someone would do this review and upload.
> > 
> > If there's anything I still can do about it, please let me know.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Sven
> > 
> > Am Montag, den 02.12.2019, 21:16 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer:
> > > Hello Eriberto,
> > > 
> > > may I ask you to do this review and upload?
> > > 
> > > You already reviewed tomb 2.7+dfsg1-1 and 2.7+dfsg2-1, and there
> > > is
> > > only a small change to d/salsa-ci.yml for buster-backports.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Sven
> > > 
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 20:21 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer:
> > > > Hello Team,
> > > > 
> > > > I just learned how to control the distribution used to run the
> > > > tests,
> > > > piuparts test don't fail anymore.
> > > > 
> > > > Please review and upload the tomb for buster-backports [1]
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Sven
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb/tree/debian/buster-backports
> > > > 
> > > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 20:00 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer:
> > > > > Hello Team,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I prepared version 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1 of the package [1].
> > > > > Please
> > > > > review and upload it although it fails the piuparts test in
> > > > > salsa's
> > > > > CI.
> > > > > 
> > > > > From what I can see the reason for failing the test is that
> > > > > it is
> > > > > run
> > > > > on the wrong distribution (sid) for buster-backports
> > > > > packages.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Excerpts from the logs [2]:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > 0m0.0s INFO: Command line arguments: /usr/sbin/piuparts --
> > > > > mirror
> > > > > '
> > > > > http://deb.debian.org/debian main' --scriptsdir
> > > > > /etc/piuparts/scripts
> > > > > --allow-database --warn-on-leftovers-after-purge --hard-link
> > > > > -e
> > > > > /tmp/debian-chroot --distribution sid '/builds/pkg-security-
> > > > > team/tomb/debian/output/tomb-dbgsym_2.7+dfsg2-
> > > > > 1~bpo10+1_amd64.deb'
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >   The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > > >    tomb-dbgsym : Depends: tomb (= 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1) but
> > > > > 2.7+dfsg2-
> > > > > 1
> > > > > is to be installed
> > > > >   E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken
> > > > > packages.
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > 
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Sven
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb
> > > > > [2] 
> > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb/-/jobs/411827
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > 
> > iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEPfXoqkP8n9/QhvGVrfUO2vit1YUFAl3z++wACgkQrfUO2vit
> > 1YXC/g//ZL9KVy3HgQOf2SpXd2rJ+i6IeUkhdiaVXpwjQ5HuCA0LRLfBaMa6jH28
> > arcEex05h2Whb9ZolT8KLmto3RgN+ulklZC06KWByzhVL279qXcYN8y1jOwJud6O
> > YLkQcVxnbfE42Ekp0Gv5oM26j+996VvrjSbadsnSsQl7YizbPGWncf8uzOtYBLir
> > aNkh7H8vpJyY65ZDGx0UuMTpF3hzAPPjQsu1gaKPmwoyAqPnUh3BKNAipqTl1HKF
> > BLUbz1JDqF9qu7O2uO9uBoHd+4HDEbxTtuJE62PGF0PcIJc85j3Nr/jB321+B0Jl
> > fI5t2XcahIWeS4X+XgPBRsFJdnLMds2dKSA5oPaDvWNgB0+RmlhCJhPu2stCcP1g
> > BP/U4hHF0b7Wq5/SceE18hZcQW27Jo6yO5xBx+77l/2CfRnvrlHB5TdMBdYouPgX
> > ZqkUDgDclBEFQlH8p2fd720STAD10ONlJEFRQ+p5YS+d3ixk5bAZgU4Kevx8w5+G
> > 6gNypHmbN4dPvgm3SzkSMU44L6x3uZ7JzVYvvagexQfVVH//mguBGNzgdKEDi2vA
> > EIJg92SQLcFdfsaG4m7k3jQ5SSTbDLvt/HOiQl4X/VxnzxoNtbYtRN5JXlSSEXmM
> > S/OlDRkCME/Ny+3xmIdHm6UZESq1fwBPZhehSrJr8AL4SUtw1bg=
> > =S1VH
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=cNFy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: