Re: tomb 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1 ready for review and upload
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello Team,
I just learned how to control the distribution used to run the tests,
piuparts test don't fail anymore.
Please review and upload the tomb for buster-backports [1]
Cheers,
Sven
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb/tree/debian/buster-backports
Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 20:00 +0100 schrieb Sven Geuer:
> Hello Team,
>
> I prepared version 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1 of the package [1]. Please
> review and upload it although it fails the piuparts test in salsa's
> CI.
>
> From what I can see the reason for failing the test is that it is run
> on the wrong distribution (sid) for buster-backports packages.
>
> Excerpts from the logs [2]:
> [...]
> 0m0.0s INFO: Command line arguments: /usr/sbin/piuparts --mirror '
> http://deb.debian.org/debian main' --scriptsdir /etc/piuparts/scripts
> --allow-database --warn-on-leftovers-after-purge --hard-link -e
> /tmp/debian-chroot --distribution sid '/builds/pkg-security-
> team/tomb/debian/output/tomb-dbgsym_2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1_amd64.deb'
> [...]
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> tomb-dbgsym : Depends: tomb (= 2.7+dfsg2-1~bpo10+1) but 2.7+dfsg2-
> 1
> is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> [...]
>
> Cheers,
> Sven
>
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/tomb/-/jobs/411827
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=GkjK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: