arno-iptables-firewall 2.0.3-3 ready for review and upload
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello Team,
I pushed version 2.0.3-3 of arno-iptables-firewall to salsa [1]. Please
review and upload it despite the failed autopkgtest in salsa's CI.
I believe it fails due to the limited networking functionality provided
by docker. The same test runs successful on my local machine with debci
which uses lxc containers. I forward a log excerpt below:
$ debci localtest ../build-area/arno-iptables-firewall_2.0.3-
3_amd64.changes
autopkgtest [21:42:48]: version 5.11
autopkgtest [21:42:48]: host e580sg; command line: /usr/bin/autopkgtest
- --no-built-binaries --user debci --apt-upgrade --output-dir=/tmp/debci-
localtest.vqZrZowqZ7 --shell-fail ../build-area/arno-iptables-
firewall_2.0.3-3_amd64.changes -- lxc --sudo --name ci-1573418568
autopkgtest-unstable-amd64
autopkgtest [21:42:59]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ test bed setup
[...]
Setting up arno-iptables-firewall (2.0.3-3) ...
Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/arno-
iptables-firewall.service → /lib/systemd/system/arno-iptables-
firewall.service.
Setting up autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
Processing triggers for systemd (242-8) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.29-3) ...
(Reading database ... 12920 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
autopkgtest [21:43:18]: test test1: [-----------------------
checking the config file for expected content
checking for expected iptables rules
checking for expected ip6tables rules
autopkgtest [21:43:19]: test test1: -----------------------]
autopkgtest [21:43:19]: test test1: - - - - - - - - - - results - - -
- - - - - - - -
test1 PASS
autopkgtest [21:43:19]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary
test1 PASS
I: test artifacts available at /tmp/debci-localtest.vqZrZowqZ7
Cheers,
Sven
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/arno-iptables-firewall
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Ej0p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: