[Pkg-security-team] metasploit-framework - issues building the package
- Subject: [Pkg-security-team] metasploit-framework - issues building the package
- From: samueloph@gmail.com (Samuel Henrique)
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:03:09 -0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] CABwkT9p_N+UT6=f9ypDd-zvpBYbc5yY=u095RPya+om3zC2HRQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20160816082506.GA17935@home.ouaza.com>
- References: <1931350990.21542096.1470899504908.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <77ce60dc-2e81-388b-e02a-4b9de47a197d@edermarques.net> <20160816082506.GA17935@home.ouaza.com>
Just a heads up that i will try to help packaging metasploit-framework, so
you may see some changes being pushed by myself on the next few days.
Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
2016-08-16 5:25 GMT-03:00 Raphael Hertzog <hertzog at debian.org>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, Eder L. Marques wrote:
> > The error now is about the main dh_install target:
> > dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) ".bundle" (tried in "." and
> > "debian/tmp")
> > dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "vendor" (tried in "." and
> > "debian/tmp")
>
> You should really try to understand what the packaging is doing... here
> you have two files/directories that dh_install tries to install (because
> debian/metasploit-framework.install says so!) and that are only needed
> if you actually package the gem bundle that the rules file was creating.
>
> If you get rid of the bundle (and you should for Debian), then you have
> to update the set of files that you install.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Rapha?l Hertzog ? Debian Developer
>
> Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
> Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-security-team mailing list
> Pkg-security-team at lists.alioth.debian.org
> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-security-team
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-security-team/attachments/20170620/2e11e585/attachment.html>
Reply to: