Upstreaming patches (Re: Ask for review)
Hi,
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote:
> I've decided not to report changes made to dsniff as the latest (last?)
> upstream version is a "beta" version from 2002. Do we document the fact
> that we consider upstream dead somewhere (or is the fact that our patch
> queue has a length of 35 documentation enough?)?
Adding a word about this in README.Debian (or even in the package
description in debian/control) is a possibility.
> For libnids I've opened two additional issues in the sourcefourge BTS.
> I've added links in the DEP-3 headers of our patches.
Great!
> Btw: is there a reason http://dep.debian.net is not available via https?
> Is there a way to find out who (or which pseudo-package) is responsible
> for that service?
http://dep.debian.net is actually http://dep.alioth.debian.org
and I don't think that alioth offers https access for the project
websites it hosts.
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/dep/
Cheers,
--
Rapha?l Hertzog ? Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
Reply to: