Bug#828287: dsniff: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
- Subject: Bug#828287: dsniff: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
- From: mfouces@yahoo.es (Marcos Fouces)
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:39:40 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 2e419730-60e9-7bc5-65fb-ac684d81446a@yahoo.es>
- In-reply-to: <1482244223@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
- References: <CAB4XWXzXBC6ttw82at=Q4mpqxHt4F-Ms0OyJSWh8bSn9HRAQqQ@mail.gmail.com> <1478553326@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <20161220041154.25y7s22pwbfmtypa@bunk.spdns.de> <1482225835@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <1482244223@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
A new revision of the package is hosted at pkg-security team. I did some
improvements (i also add your patch) and the package is hopefully ready
for upload. Just need a sponsor.
Check it here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-security/dsniff.git/
Cheers,
Marcos
El 20/12/16 a las 15:37, Christoph Biedl escribi?:
> Christoph Biedl wrote...
>
>> Adrian Bunk wrote...
>>
>>> Can you make an NMU with your patch
>>> (or by changing it to libssl1.0-dev)?
>> Can even, even upon short notice. However, dsniff got a new maintainer
>> (#847505), included.
> This probably didn't work due to a local error, sorry.
>
>> Marcos, do you want to take over? Personally, I'd
>> switch to libssl1.0-dev, it's less intrusive and the package needs a
>> lot of love anyway - which can wait until the stretch release.
> Marcos, I suggest to take over. That was also the opportunity to
> update the maintainer field so it will be correct for stretch.
>
> Adrian, find a debdiff attached, using the libssl1.0-dev package. I'd
> suggest to upload to delayed+2, so Marcos has some time to react. The
> frame is small I admit but time's almost up, and it's just to get dsniff
> into stretch, nothing else.
>
> All the best,
>
> Christoph
Reply to: