rkhunter backport for squeeze?
Le jeudi 03 nov. 2011 ? 16:15:00 (+0100 CET), Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a ?crit?:
> Many thanks for your work on the rkhunter package, I'm using it on quite
> some machines. However, I would be very interested in having backports
> of the package available (via backports.d.o). Backporting rkhunter
> seems also to be quite easy, but being just a user and not deeper
> involved in it's packaging or development, I'm wondering if there could
> be a reason not to backport it? Surely I'm not the first one interested
> in one.
Actually, yes, you are the first one to ask for it which partly explains why
there is no backport for rkhunter.
> If there's no reason, would you mind if I upload a backport to the
> archive, or would you prefer to do it on your own?
I can do this myself if that's fine for you. I however would like to upload
the 1.3.8-10 version first which fixes the bug you have just reported (BTW,
thanks for the patch), as well as #644326.
I also agree there shouldn't be any problem with the backport, hence I'll
upload it as soon as the new version enters in testing.
.''`. Julien Valroff ~ <julien at kirya.net> ~ <julien at debian.org>
: :' : Debian Developer & Free software contributor
`. `'` http://www.kirya.net/
`- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1