[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#613961: marked as done (libphash: FTBFS on armel - 'UINT64_C' was not declared)



Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:48:04 +0000
with message-id <E1PreY0-0004Yh-9O at franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#613961: fixed in libphash 0.9.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #613961,
regarding libphash: FTBFS on armel - 'UINT64_C' was not declared
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
613961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613961
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>
Subject: libphash: FTBFS on armel - 'UINT64_C' was not declared
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:12:35 +0000
Size: 4079
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/forensics-devel/attachments/20110221/96d83b51/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#613961: fixed in libphash 0.9.4-1
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:48:04 +0000
Size: 5478
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/forensics-devel/attachments/20110221/96d83b51/attachment-0001.eml>


Reply to: