[SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5983-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
August 22, 2025 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : qemu
CVE ID : CVE-2025-54566 CVE-2025-54567
This update removes the usage of the C (Credential) flag for the
binfmt_misc registration within the qemu-user package, as it allowed for
privilege escalation when running a suid/sgid binary under qemu-user.
This means suid/sgid foreign-architecture binaries are not running with
elevated privileges under qemu-user anymore. If you relied on this
behavior of qemu-user in the past (running suid/sgid foreign-arch
binaries), this will require changes to your deployment.
In Bookworm the affected packages are qemu-user-static (and
qemu-user-binfmt) instead of qemu-user.
Additionally, two security issues were fixed the in SR-IOV support
of QEMU system emulation.
For the oldstable distribution (bookworm), these problems have been fixed
in version 1:7.2+dfsg-7+deb12u15.
For the stable distribution (trixie), these problems have been fixed in
version 1:10.0.2+ds-2+deb13u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your qemu packages.
For the detailed security status of qemu please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/qemu
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=s2Hd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: