[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5563-1] intel-microcode security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5563-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
November 23, 2023                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : intel-microcode
CVE ID         : CVE-2023-23583
Debian Bug     : 1055962

Benoit Morgan, Paul Grosen, Thais Moreira Hamasaki, Ke Sun, Alyssa
Milburn, Hisham Shafi, Nir Shlomovich, avis Ormandy, Daniel Moghimi,
Josh Eads, Salman Qazi, Alexandra Sandulescu, Andy Nguyen, Eduardo Vela,
Doug Kwan, and Kostik Shtoyk discovered that some Intel processors
mishandle repeated sequences of instructions leading to unexpected
behavior, which may result in privilege escalation, information
disclosure or denial of service.

For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), this problem has been fixed
in version 3.20231114.1~deb11u1.

For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 3.20231114.1~deb12u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your intel-microcode packages.

For the detailed security status of intel-microcode please refer to its
security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/intel-microcode

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=l9kq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: