[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages



Right, and I think its strange that the parent process felt the need
to kill the child process. It might be justified if the child seg'd
or died, but i thought xinetd handled this with more grace than say
inetd...  just curious, thats all.

g.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Hammers [mailto:ch@westend.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Gary MacDougall
Cc: Sven Hoexter; debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: strange proftpd segfault and conntrack_ftp messages


On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:31:38AM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote:
> I find it interesting that the seg fault happened, then xinetd reported it
> failed.
xinetd was proftpd's daddy:
	ServerType              inetd

bye,

 -christian-

--
Christian Hammers    WESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren     Tel 0241/701333-0
ch@westend.com     Internet & Security for Professionals    Fax 0241/911879
           WESTEND ist CISCO Systems Partner - Premium Certified


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.310 / Virus Database: 171 - Release Date: 12/19/2001

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.310 / Virus Database: 171 - Release Date: 12/19/2001



Reply to: