[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to re-build my (first) package feenox



Hi Jeremy,

Le 21/03/2025 à 12:10, Jeremy Theler a écrit :
Hello all. Newbie question here and my sponsor Pierre is not available.

Busy week at work, I am back :)


On Sunday the FTP master accepted my package feenox v1.0.133:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=feenox

There were some tight tolerances in the tests that made all the non-
amd64 target to fail. Pierre noticed this inmediately so I increased
the tolerance (among other small fixes) upstream and

  1. created v1.0.155 upstream
  2. updated the changelog in salsa to v1.0.155
https://salsa.debian.org/jtheler/feenox/-/blob/main/debian/changelog?ref_type=heads

In the meantime, another Debian maintainer reported the failing tests
as a bug:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100843

I already contacted him telling that v1.0.155 fixes the bug.
But I am not understanding how to re-trigger the build of the package
with the new upstream version and updated changelog.

Somehow the CI already noticed that there is a newer version upstream:
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jeremy%40seamplex.com

But it does not re-build the package.
I re-built it locally and tried to do

gtheler@krusty:~$ dput ftp-master feenox_1.0.155-1_source.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: /home/gtheler/feenox_1.0.155-1_source.changes: Error checking
signature from 4A3AC4A9ECE04E36: SignatureVerifyError: 0
Checking signature on .dsc
gpg: /home/gtheler/feenox_1.0.155-1.dsc: Error checking signature from
4A3AC4A9ECE04E36: SignatureVerifyError: 0
Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to ftp.upload.debian.org):
   Uploading feenox_1.0.155-1.dsc: done.
   Uploading feenox_1.0.155.orig.tar.gz: done.
   Uploading feenox_1.0.155-1.debian.tar.xz: done.
   Uploading feenox_1.0.155-1_source.buildinfo: done.
   Uploading feenox_1.0.155-1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.
gtheler@krusty:~$

But nothing changed.
Any help is welcome.

Indeed you updated the packaging in Salsa, cool! And yes it has to be uploaded this way -- which I did some minuts ago -- by someone with the proper rights.

I made some changes to the packaging, please see them in Salsa -- also I have some suggestions that I will share with you shortly :)


Regards
--
jeremy


All the best,

--
Pierre

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: