Re: cmark-gfm NMU in experimental

[Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 08:30:06AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> From: Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org>
> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 13:40:10 +0100
> 
> Hello Keith and debian-science,
> 
> > To avoid a lot of packages to be removed from testing, I have uploaded
> > cmark-gfm 0.29.0.gfm.13-0.1 to experimental to update it to a version
> > with less open security issues.
> > This requires a new SONAME so this will go to the NEW queue.
> 
> Thanks; of course we both uploaded on the same day :-)

and since I used -0.1 and you used -1, you won, so my version never
reached experimental, which is for the best, but you can get it at

https://people.debian.org/~ballombe/cmark-gfm

> I'll take a look at your version and see if I missed anything.

Mostly this 
  * debian/rules:
    - auto_clean: delete test/__pycache__. (Closes: #1043789)

I added to debian/rules
execute_after_dh_clean:
        rm -rf test/__pycache__/

Cheers,
Bill.