Re: ncl has not set science-team as maintainer
Hi Alastair,
Am Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:05:35AM +0100 schrieb Alastair McKinstry:
> Yes I will change maintainer on the next upload.
Thanks.
> ncl is in "maintenance" mode as of 2019. There is a pivot to python (pyNCL
> and other python modules) but there are still a lot of ncl scripts in use
> out there, so an upstream release is unlikely.
Thank you for the status update. BTW, I'd recommend running
routine-update on the packaging (I'd volunteer to do so and push
to Git in case you want me to do so.)
Kind regards
Andreas.
> Kind regards
>
> Alastair
>
> On 19/04/2024 09:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Alastair,
> >
> > I've found ncl in the list of packages with t64 transition issues.
> > Since I know its a Debian Science package I had a look and realised
> > that this package has not set
> >
> > Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> >
> > as per team policy (and you as well as possibly others as Uploaders).
> > Do you have any specific reason for this?
> >
> > BTW, when looking into it uscan reports
> >
> > uscan info: Newest version of ncl on remote site is 6.6.2, local version is 6.6.2.dfsg.1
> > uscan info: => Only older package available from:
> >
> > This is probably due to using .dfsg instead of +dfsg. I tried to add
> > some dversionmangle option but when featuring a '.' this is refused as
> > "unsafe" by uscan. I'd recommend to change this with next upstream
> > version.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Andreas.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/04/msg00331.html
> >
> --
> Alastair McKinstry,
> GPG: 82383CE9165B347C787081A2CBE6BB4E5D9AD3A5
> e: mckinstry@debian.org, im: @alastair:mckinstry.ie
>
>
--
https://fam-tille.de
Reply to: