Re: Please give-back armhf build of opm-common-2022.10+ds-6
Hi Drew,
Thanks a lot.
I guess I will need to limit the architectures again then and definitely exclude
armhf.
This will also fix the issue that OPM is blocked because of autopkgtest not being run
on architectures where no binaries are built.
Best,
Markus
Am Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 05:15:30PM +0100 schrieb Drew Parsons:
The armhf (and x32) failure seems enduring. I guess it needs to be
fixed in code. Or ignored.
Drew
On 2023-03-22 15:07, Drew Parsons wrote:
done
On 2023-03-22 12:48, Markus Blatt wrote:
Hi,
somehow the armhf build of opm-common-2022.10+ds-6 failed. This
seems to happen
from time to time, see [1]. Not nice, but I am unable to replicate
this. There were
no changes between the versions that would explain the build failure
Would be cool if someone with Debian Developer status could give-back
that build to
buildd at [2] and it will hopefully succeed. Then this migth migrate
once unblocked.
Note that autopkgtests succeed for all architectures where binaries
are actually built.
There are two important fixes that make this worth-while:
- Build time has been drastically reduced (factor > 2), see [3].
(There was a massive
increase in built time when gcc-12 was introduced)
- Printed version string in programs is correct ("2022.10 (Debian
GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm):
2022.10+ds-1+b2)" instead of "2022.10 ( lsb_release -r | sed
s/.*:s*([^s]*).*/1/: 2022.10+ds-1+b2)")
Best,
Markus
[1] <https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=opm-common&arch=armhf>
[2] <https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=opm-common>
[3] <https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=opm-common&arch=amd64>
--
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany, USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
Reply to: