Re: Incoming new flint 2.9.0 ==> beta1 in experimental

To: "julien.puydt@gmail.com" <julien.puydt@gmail.com>
Cc: Debian Science <debian-science@lists.debian.org>, Development issues of sagemath and related tools <debian-science-sagemath@alioth-lists.debian.net>, "debian-math@lists.debian.org" <debian-math@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Incoming new flint 2.9.0 ==> beta1 in experimental
From: "Torrance, Douglas" <dtorrance@piedmont.edu>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 00:27:34 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k0af7ms2.fsf@piedmont.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 60732837432d0d6aa9825233cce8cdd8b88a43a8.camel@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 60732837432d0d6aa9825233cce8cdd8b88a43a8.camel@gmail.com>


On Thu 19 May 2022 08:47:24 AM EDT, julien.puydt@gmail.com wrote:

version beta1 of flint 2.9.0 is out, with big changes announced.

I could already check it would have broken flint-arb, and uploaded a
version with a patch to unbreak it. [A new upstream flint-arb will
follow the flint release, but I didn't want any temporary hard ride.]

I uploaded 2.9.0~beta1-1 to experimental so everyone could have a look,
check and report for issues (here first, I'll forward to upstream if

necessary).


Great -- thanks for the heads up!

I checked and Macaulay2 builds without problems using the flint 2.9.0 package in experimental.

Doug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Incoming new flint 2.9.0 ==> beta1 in experimental
  - From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>

References:
- Incoming new flint 2.9.0 ==> beta1 in experimental
  - From: julien.puydt@gmail.com

Prev by Date: Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] I'm planning to RM src:julia . Can't bear anymore.
Next by Date: Ceres solver version 2.1.0
Previous by thread: Incoming new flint 2.9.0 ==> beta1 in experimental
Next by thread: Re: Incoming new flint 2.9.0 ==> beta1 in experimental
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread