Re: Failures for sklearn
Dear Chiara,
thanks a lot for working on this.
Am Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 02:33:07PM -1000 schrieb Chiara Marmo:
> Dear scikit-learn maintainers,
>
> I have updated the scikit-learn version on salsa and modified some of the
> EXCLUDE_TESTS variables in order to reflect the current status of the
> scikit-learn issue tracker.
> I was hoping to run continuous integration on salsa, but it is very time
> consuming for scikit-learn, so I'm switching it on and off, when needed.
Speaking about Salsa-CI: The last run is
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/scikit-learn/-/jobs/2454291
connected to commit dba31326ec5b746ff3ba2ae067f4b49f4811c9eb. Would you
confirm that your last commit excludes those two failures that are
breaking the test? BTW, how are you aware that you can skip Salsa-CI by
adding the string [ci skip] or [skip ci]. This would make it more
transparent what commit was checked by CI and what not.
> I must confess that I am a bit confused about how the last builds of
> scikit-learn are failing with respect to setuptools (
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/scikit-learn/).
>
> Should it be possible to upload this 1.0.2 version, to check if I have
> correctly patch the tests?
> Otherwise I'd be happy to listen to your comments and suggestions about the
> current status of the repo.
I've done some minor changes (normalising d/changelog and renamed
debian/.gitlab-ci.yml to debian/salsa-ci.yml) and check Salsa-CI
for this commit. (Just noticed that there was also a NMU which I
added as well and used [ci skip] ...)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: