Hello Again, On 29/05/2021 14:17, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
On Sat 29 May 2021 06:44:24 AM EDT, Jerome BENOIT wrote:On 29/05/2021 01:06, Torrance, Douglas wrote:On Fri 28 May 2021 05:46:31 AM EDT, erentar2002 wrote:Sagemath 9.3 got released.While we're on the subject of packaging Sage 9.3, the new version now
includes Singular 4.2.0 [1]. Macaulay2 also just bumped the minimum required version of Singular (well, factory, which is shipped with Singular) to 4.2.0 [2].
I'd be interested in getting Singular 4.2.0 in experimental soon. I've played around a little bit with packaging it already [3] and soon should have a working draft that we'll start using for Macaulay2's GitHub workflows [4].I am the current maintainer of the singular package. I have now time before me. Please let me some time to work on getting Singular 4.2.0Absolutely! I didn't want to step on your toes, so I only pushed my work to my Salsa fork. Feel free to use or ignore any of what I did.One thing I'd like to do is split factory off into its own set of binary packages for use when building Macaulay2 [5]. Would there be any objections to that?Would you be okay with doing this? This isn't unprecedented, e.g. Fedora splits factory, factory-devel, and factory-gftables into separate rpms
[6].
I will first update to avoid the NEWS limbo. Having say that, meanwhile, why libsingular4-dev is not enough ? Best, Jerome
[1] https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25993 [2] https://github.com/Macaulay2/M2/commit/2945906 [3] https://salsa.debian.org/dtorrance/singular [4] https://github.com/Macaulay2/M2/pull/2115 [5] https://github.com/Macaulay2/M2/issues/1681[6] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Singular/blob/rawhide/f/Singular.spec
-- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature