On 1/25/21 1:21 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
[CCing my reply to the list, which I mistakenly missed to do earlier]On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 23:50, Nilesh Patra <npatra974@gmail.com <mailto:npatra974@gmail.com>> wrote:On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 23:44, Torrance, Douglas <dtorrance@piedmont.edu <mailto:dtorrance@piedmont.edu>> wrote: Unfortunately, the i386 build has already failed. :( [1] I think this is an isolated incident, as I've built it on i386 regularly in the past. I did so, and get the output as: You are authenticated as gi-boi-guest. ✓ Working on package macaulay2, suite sid and architecture i386. ✓ Package version 1.17.1+ds-2 in state Build-Attempted, can be given back. ✓ Successfully given back the package. ✓ I suppose that's what you asked for?
Yes, exactly -- thank you!The ppc64el build (which also usually isn't a problem) has also failed [2], if you or anyone else would be willing to give that back, too. :)
I tried to request a giveback, but I'm not a member of the "debian"
Salsa group. Would someone else be able to request one (or
maybe, if
possible, add me to the group)?
You mean this[1]?
I presume only a DD gets access to it.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/debian <https://salsa.debian.org/debian>
Please let me know if you meant something else and/or I messed up
something by any chance.
Apparently non-DD's can be granted access through sponsorship [3]. Doug[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=macaulay2&arch=ppc64el&ver=1.17.1%2Bds-2&stamp=1611598660&raw=0 [3] https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc#Collaborative_Maintenance:_.22Debian.22_group
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xD12B2BE26D3FF663.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature