[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release



Anton,

Thanks for taking the time to update that package! Upstream has released
another RC (which should be identical to 3.0 with the exception of
translation updates). Additionally, we've found a patch from upstream
mimalloc that should fix the armel build (I hope), and which I have
included in the debian package. I have updated to that upstream release,
and updated the package substantially (removed some bundled fonts and
js, etc) and pushed to my salsa repo: I wasn't sure if you wanted me to
push to the main team repo, especially since the existing version is
"3.0.rc1+repack1" which Lintian warns me is not less than 3.0 - I did my
import as "3.0~rc2+repack1" accordingly.

https://salsa.debian.org/rpavlik/solvespace

When you have a chance, I'd appreciate a review and sponsoring. I've
done basic testing of the package myself, especially the parts that are
affected by patches/repack, and it seems to work well to me.

Thanks!

Ryan

On 1/16/2021 12:09 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> the newer version of solvespace is in sid already. There is a problem
> with armel compilation
>
> selected processor does not support `yield' in ARM mode
>
> So I requested the removal of the package on this platform.
> If somebody has an advice how to fix this special assembler-problem,
> please let me know.
>
> Best regards
>
> Anton
>
>
> Anton
>
>
> Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 00:33 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik <ryan.pavlik@gmail.com>:
>>
>> On 1/9/2021 2:27 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>>> Dear members of Debian Science Team,
>>>
>>> we are approaching to a new stable release freeze. If youhave some
>>> packages to be sponsored, please let us know.
>>>
>>> I have a very limited time, but I will try to review/sponsor someof
>>> packages.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Anton
>>
>> I see you were the last to touch the SolveSpace package. Do you expect
>> to have time to look at that soon to update to the new RC? (They/we have
>> very high stability standards, 3.0 could have been released 2 years ago)
>> If not, I'll go ahead and update to the latest tagged upstream this week
>> and request sponsorship.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>>


Reply to: