[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: MeshLab update ready to review/sponsor



Update:  Thanks very much to a responsive and helpful upstream, my patch
to adjust the build system again was accepted, so for sure 2021.01 will
be easy to package. If someone wants to package 2020.12 sooner, they
should grab a git snapshot after this point:

https://github.com/cnr-isti-vclab/meshlab/commit/b3d10763863a216adf581e6a771cbae66e03648f

There is docs in the get-orig-sources.sh script on how to pull a commit
hash instead of a tag.

Ryan

On 12/1/2020 5:24 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> Hello Debian scientists!
>
> I have completed the update of the MeshLab package to 2020.09, which was
> the latest upstream release before this morning. It is presently in
> Salsa, ready for review and sponsorship:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/meshlab
>
> As is common with this project, upstream shuffled/added some bundled
> deps, so the files-excluded list got updated as did the rest of the
> copyright file, which was the bulk of the work. On the plus side, the
> file now mostly is the same as the output of `cme update
> dpkg-copyright`, which should reduce maintenance burden.
>
> I don't have time this week to look at 2020.12, released today, but it
> does make our Files-Excluded work much harder through some build system
> modification/re-org. I've opened some discussions with upstream about
> these changes, and hopefully they'll revise them so we can have an
> easier-to-package 2021.01, and maybe just skip 2020.12 entirely.
>
> This will fix https://bugs.debian.org/975157 - the lone bug, a FTBFS and
> thus serious.
>
> I'd also like to acknowledge the help of Anton Gladky in getting the
> previous 2020.06 release out.
>
> Thanks for your reviews and sponsorship!
>
> Ryan Pavlik
>
> (Apologies for my previous unreadable encrypted email: looks like I
> accidentally encrypted the email to myself instead of signing it. I have
> reverted my Thunderbird settings.)
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: