[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team



Thanks Andreas and Christian for the updates/comments. I agree that I should have been more verbose in the changelog. I'm tracing all the commits to learn more about packaging. I was playing with gbp for updating upstream. I really like how it works with git! No worries, my time was not wasted anyway. 

I talked to Christian briefly about the symbol file. He added one for liblinear4. I have a question about this file. The symbol file I generated looks a bit different from liblinear4.symbols, in which several lines start with (c++) and contain the exact parameters. I couldn't figure out how to make dpkg-gensymbols produce this.
 
Thanks,
Chen-Tse


On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 10:02 AM Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 03:04:47PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2019-12-25 10:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Kind regards
> >
> >        Andreas.
>
> I've re-read my original message and feel that I was overly harsh. I was
> irritated about the rushed upgrade as in private communication with
> Chen-Tse, I highlighted precisely the possible complexity of this
> upgrade and how it should be performed properly -- but, that was private
> communication.

I admit I did not considered it overly harsh.  My upload was in fact not
the best idea and your response just reflected it.

> Apologies.

Thanks but from my point of view not needed.  Everything is fine at my
side and as I said I'll now leave the issue to you who are more
comfortable with that package.  Something that came to my mind later:
When upstream does not mark SOVERSIONs:  In this case I usually add a
symbols file.  Thats more maintenance burden but usually helps to spot
issues with ABI changes.

Kind regards

       Andreas.


--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to: