[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#936924: Moving libsvm to Debian Science team



Hi Chen-Tse,

thanks for you quick response.

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 09:48:14AM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> Hi, Andreas,
> 
> I agree with your suggestions. Thanks for putting it on salsa!

Thanks for confirming.
 
> Should I investigate dropping python2? I can spend some time this week on
> this. But I may need help with debian stuff.

What exact help do you need?  Do you have a login on Salsa?  We could
add you to science-team to grant you commit permissions.  I admit I have
not yet looked into the packaging - just realised that its cdbs which is
unfortunate since it would not eliminate the Python2 dependency fully.

Kind regards

      Andreas. 
 
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 7:39 AM Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:28:57AM +0000, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > > I second this proposal, and the same for src:liblinear.
> >
> > That's done as I wrote.
> >
> > > These are high popcon packages, dependencies for a number of other
> > > packages. They should be team maintained to unblock important fixes.
> >
> > To push a bit I just commited
> >
> >    https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libsvm
> >
> > Last maintainer upload was more than 3 years ago, 2 NMUs inbetween,
> > package is lagging behind upstream.  Anybody is kindly invited to adapt
> > the packaging (I think we should really get rid of cdbs since this in
> > turn is Python2) and proceed from here.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> >      Andreas.
> >
> >
> > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:35:28AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > Hi Chen-Tse,
> > > >
> > > > I'm maintaining a package that depends from libsvm.  Due to bug #936924
> > > > that did not received any response since August it is in danger to be
> > > > removed from testing so I'm interested that this bug will be fixed.
> > > > When looking at the package I realised that while it would fit into
> > > > Debian Science team scope it is not team maintained nor is there any
> > > > repository in Salsa.  That's why I have the following suggestion:
> > > >
> > > >   1. I create a repository on Salsa
> > > >   2. Move the package to Debian Science team maintenance
> > > >      and add you as Uploader
> > > >   3. Drop Python2 package and close bug #936924
> > > >   4. May be migrate packaging from cdbs to dh
> > > >
> > > > If I do not hear from you until Monday I assume you agree with this
> > > > plan and will do so.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards
> > > >
> > > >      Andreas.
> > > >
> > > > PS: @Christian: I noticed that you and Chen-Tse are maintaining
> > > >     liblinear.  I have just removed Python2 package and reassigned
> > > >     #936889 to ftp.debian.org to make sure python-liblinear will be
> > > >     removed.  Thus libsvm can be dealt as suggested.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://fam-tille.de
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: