Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed

To: 945389@bugs.debian.org, Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:32:16 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 06bde392-f502-cda7-8d8a-3623211d47d4@zoho.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20191205181801.hq6oro5j6qmqg77e@aurelius.localdomain>

Stefan van der Walt wrote:

One possibility is that NumPy was compiled with an older version of
Cython:[...]
Do you know how I can check the source files for the NumPy 1.17 build
that is used here?


Source: https://sources.debian.org/src/numpy/1:1.17.4-3/
Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=numpy

numpy was built with cython3 0.29.14-0.1. (Not +b1, but I _think_ "AddPython3.8 as supported version" means the ability to run cython3 itselfin python3.8, not the ability to compile modules for python3.8.)

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
  - From: Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
Next by Date: Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
Next by thread: Re: Bug#945389: Tried to upgrade skimage to see whether #945389 is fixed but failed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread