Re: Pandas

To: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Pandas
From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:42:49 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 9981cd37-d6a4-0d51-daeb-b1cce9709243@zoho.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] d57f144e-3981-4c47-8842-c0f64c2ec0e2@zoho.com>
References: <[🔎] e7258d3b-70e2-b263-15ea-03d258f477a9@zoho.com> <[🔎] d57f144e-3981-4c47-8842-c0f64c2ec0e2@zoho.com>

I now have fixes for both #918206 (test failure, RC) and #804552 (nodocumentation), in those bugs. (Would you prefer to have a salsa branch?)

Several other open pandas bugs appear to be either already fixed ornon-bugs: is it appropriate for me to close them?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pandas
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de>

References:
- Re: Pandas new version
  - From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
- Re: Pandas new version
  - From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Any reason not to simply upload ceres-solver with adjusted version of libeigen3-dev
Next by Date: Re: Pandas
Previous by thread: Re: Pandas new version
Next by thread: Re: Pandas
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread