Le lundi 07 janvier 2019 à 11:53 +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz a écrit : > running the appended little script on my system a lot of packages are found > which contain libraries linked to libopenblas.so.0. But all these packages don't > declare a dependency on libopenblas-base. > This seems to me not o.k. > > Since libblas.so.3 from package libopenblas-base itself is linked to > libopenblas.so.0, I guess the linking to libopenblas.so.0 is expendable. > > Any idea? It looks like you are misled by ldd, which for some reason lists libopenblas.so.0 as an ELF dynamic dependency, while it is not actually needed (at least as a direct dependency). For example, liboctave6 appears in your list, and indeed ldd returns libopenblas.so.0 in the ELF dynamic dependencies when libopenblas-base is installed. But as soon as I remove openblas, that dependency disappears, and octave runs smoothly. So I think there is no bug here, only confusing output from ldd. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part