Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms

To: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
From: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 21:16:49 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 830c9da7-b2d4-535a-1a50-37bf74e68b11@laposte.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20180224200806.iccbp5hgy3qrg33c@villemot.name>
References: <[🔎] 20180224194719.GV3325@hopa.kiewit.dartmouth.edu> <[🔎] 20180224200806.iccbp5hgy3qrg33c@villemot.name>

Hi,

Le 24/02/2018 à 21:08, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> No, leave "Architecture: any". Then the builds will fail on those
> arches. This is what porters generally prefer, because they have a
> clear information about what is wrong with the package on their
> arch (and possibly they can act and send patches).

>From the original mail, it doesn't look like porters have been helpful
yet. Perhaps a better suggestion would be : get in touch the porters
before you decide to let things down...

Snark on #debian-science

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
  - From: Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com>

References:
- pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
  - From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
- Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
  - From: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
Next by Date: Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
Previous by thread: Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
Next by thread: Re: pandas -- I think we should drop BE platforms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread