Re: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Salsa access, creating additional git repos

[Ruben Undheim <lists@beebeetle.com>]

Hi Geert,

> So now has Salsa _two_   fpga-icestorm   git repositories.
> 
> That should only be temporary.
> 
> 
> I'm fine with having    fpga-icestorm under electronics-team.
> 
> 
> However the switch over should be clean.
> Meaning there is work to be done at the Debian Science team side.

Yes, the switch should be clean. Note however that all those packages have been
brought into Debian Science by me, and all except one, have been maintained
exclusively by me (but with a lot of sponsoring help from Debian Science!).

> I'm volunteer for the job.
> Thing that I do need some kind of acknowledge or approval
> from other members of both teams. In one word:   concensus

Seen from my side, there must be a good reason for moving the packages into the
the Debian Electronics team. I am quite happy with the Debian Science team
(although it is big). If I end up doing the move and end up in a team where
nobody is helpful and friendly, then they can rather stay where they are :D
 
> Advice for Ruben:
>  * update VCS field in the science repo of  fpga-icestorm
>  * put that content into the  electronics team repo
>  * still test drive that first (electronics) repo
>  * help with creating concensus in both team on the change you (and I) want

Thanks. Sounds like the correct procedure (when I have made up my mind).


Do you have the permission to change my status from "Developer" to "Maintainer"
on the Salsa team page ? ( Very strange that the privileges for the two roles are
in a way reversed in Salsa when compared to Debian ) This would give me the same
access as I currently have in Debian Science (and several other teams). :D

Cheers
Ruben