Re: Sundials lagging behind upstream
- To: James Tocknell <aragilar@gmail.com>
- Cc: Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Sundials lagging behind upstream
- From: Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 22:16:18 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87o9gakn6l.fsf@secretsauce.net>
- In-reply-to: <CABNXP=TMFoez+CMY0W41uUdKafeQBFVvOL-tE06GBiSq0r6X8A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20180513125457.7jhyq5ghjgmeacqi@an3as.eu> <877eo7nwqb.fsf@secretsauce.net> <CABNXP=TXkNVDhkmRoCV5VchV61WUO7eppOeSQvnJQBXcp25gug@mail.gmail.com> <87h8n1n0kt.fsf@secretsauce.net> <CABNXP=TMFoez+CMY0W41uUdKafeQBFVvOL-tE06GBiSq0r6X8A@mail.gmail.com>
James Tocknell <aragilar@gmail.com> writes:
> 2. The new matrix/solver libs refer to a (which one isn't specified)
> LICENSE file, but appear to not match any one. I've currently put them
> under the top level LICENSE (LLNL/LLNS), but that's doesn't match the top
> of the files (LLNS/SMU). Suggestions of how to handle that?
My feel is that either choice is fine for debian/copyright, but I'll
send an email to the upstream mailing list, asking them to clarify.
> With the new sunlinsol and sunmatrix, what do the SOs depend on, it'd be
> nice to avoid having to bring in the whole mpi dependency tree when mpi
> isn't being used.
OK. I split off sunlinsol and sunmatrix into their own sub-libraries.
Their SONAME versions could diverge in the future, and this would
require a split.
These packages are not perfect, but I think they're good-enough to push.
So I just pushed them to the archive. They still need to clear NEW, so
don't expect them to be installable TOMORROW, but soon.
dima
Reply to: