[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS



On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 09:18:08AM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:

> The discussion raises a separate question.  Suppose the administrator
> does make OpenBLAS the preferred alternative for the system, but an
> individual user prefers to use IntelMKL. How should the user configure
> this (for the generic blas.so.3 symbols, not recompiling explicitly
> against the specific library) ?  Set up symlinks in a local dir and
> point to that dir with LD_LIBRARY_PATH ?

Using LD_LIBRARY_PATH is indeed the easiest way to switch between BLAS
implementations on a per-user basis (since each one of them has a specific
subdir under /usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/). So the same should probably be
done for MKL.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: