RE:Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS
> We’re just talking about clearly expressing the fact that Debian prefers free
> alternatives and making sure that the user is aware of licensing issues with
> dynamic linking.
In that case maybe the best solution would be to use debconf in order to:
- display a warning about the GPL-2 incompatibility (or just display the mkl license)
- ask the user if he wants to make mkl the current alternative.
Is there a debconf backend for alternatives ?
Cheers
Reply to: