Re: Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]
2018-03-01 5:32 GMT+01:00 Kurt Kremitzki <kkremitzki@gmail.com>:
<skip>
> To summarize:
> 1. When the OCC was in Debian previously, and its current form in the Ubuntu
> PPA, we had e.g. libopencascade-foundation-7.1.0
> 2. Anton suggested e.g. libopencascade-foundation-7.2
> 3. Appendix A of the Debian New Maintainer's Guide [1] suggests
> libopencascade-foundation7 is correct
> 4. Some packages also use the form libopencascade7-foundation, and this
> seems most correct to me
>
> But which one should be used here? In the case of 4, would the -dev files
> just be e.g. libopencascade-foundation-dev? or libopencascade7-*-dev?
</skip>
Well it depends. If upstream guarantees the stable API/ABI between minor
releases, that it is OK to have libopencascade-foundation-7. But to be on
the safe side, I think it is better to use libX,Y.Z-schema.
Anton
Reply to: