Re: Help needed for licnse review (Was: r-cran-utf8_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)

To: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>, Chris Lamb <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
Cc: Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Help needed for licnse review (Was: r-cran-utf8_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)
From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:51:14 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] 1516000874.1418607.1235460152.7E615D94@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20180114075604.hchvd5uul4y7tdnd@an3as.eu>
References: <E1eaYWo-0005hg-2T@fasolo.debian.org> <[🔎] 20180114075604.hchvd5uul4y7tdnd@an3as.eu>

Hi Andreas et al.,

> Any help to fix the copyright would be welcome.

Have you tried asking upstream to clarify the matter? :) 

If they reply, please quote them — in full — in debian/copyright
for easy future visibility to all. 


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Reply to:

References:
- Help needed for licnse review (Was: r-cran-utf8_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)
  - From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: scram/0.16.2-1
Next by Date: If there is no response in debian-python then debian-science might be the right team (Was: Packaging python-aws-xray-sdk to fullfil a dependency for python-moto)
Previous by thread: Re: Help needed for licnse review (Was: r-cran-utf8_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)
Next by thread: Please clarify licensing of utf8 CRAN package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread