Re: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] -- ROM; Some build time tests are failing on specific architectures
On 13 Oct 2017, at 18:06, Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> wrote:
>
> OK folks, if nobody insists I'll do the following
>
> 1. proceed as I suggested here:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2017/10/msg00001.html
The body of the rule should be "dh_auto_test || true", not
"override_dh_auto_test || true".
> 2. Upload after migrating the package to Debian Science as
> we previously agreed upon.
>
> Is there anybody who is no happy about this?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:00:04PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:23:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> Package: ftp.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Hi ftpmasters,
>>>
>>> as discussed in detail on Debian Science list[1] please remove pandas
>>> for the said architectures to enable lowering severity of bug #877419
>>> and let the package migrate to testing at least for the working
>>> architectures.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your ftpmaster work
>>>
>>> Andreas.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2017/10/msg00009.html
>>
>> The dak command used in this email is misleading.
>>
>> -A, --no-arch-all-rdeps Do not report breaking arch:all packages
>> or Build-Depends-Indep
>>
>> Without -A you get:
>> # Broken Depends:
>> pandas: python-pandas
>> python3-pandas
>>
>> And pandas is not a leaf package.
>>
>> The removal you are requesting would make pandas no longer available on
>> these architectures.
>>
>> Due to that that you would also remove all binary-any reverse
>> (build) dependencies.
>>
>> As an example, testing migration of statsmodels is currently blocked by
>> missing builds due to non-installable pandas on the architectures where
>> you want to remove pandas.
>>
>>
>> What causes these FTBFS to appear is likely related to:
>>
>> pandas (0.20.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>> ...
>> - enabled back all the tests for now
>> ...
>> -- Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:00:59 -0400
>>
>>
>> This sounds as if pandas previously needed some fiddling with the tests,
>> and doing that again is likely a better option.[1]
>>
>>
>> cu
>> Adrian
>>
>> [1] ideally each test failure should be debugged properly,
>> but as short-term hack disabling some tests would be an option
>>
>> --
>>
>> "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
>> of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
>> "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
>> Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
Reply to: