Re: libsundials-dev
Dear Dima,
Le lundi 05 juin 2017 à 00:41 -0700, Dima Kogan a écrit :
> Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> writes:
>
> > I can confirm that the package builds at my side and has only
> > lintian
> > issues that are acceptable for me. If you ask me I would not mind
> > to
> > upload without ths symbols files in this specific case but I'll
> > leave
> > the decision to you.
>
> I updated the symbols files, and pushed the packages to experimental.
> The symbols look a bit strange in that a few symbols ("SUNRsqrt" for
> instance) are provided by every libsundials-nvec* package. Only one
> at a
> time of these is supposed to be used, so maybe this is ok, but it'd
> be
> good to think about this when making depending packages. Andreas,
> since
> you have some of these in the pipeline, please let me know if these
> duplicates are problematic, or if the nvec libraries need some
> different
> package tags or organization.
Thanks for your work on sundials. I have seen that your upload has been
rejected, due to an incomplete copyright file, but hopefully that will
be easily fixable.
Note that I now have a direct interest in sundials, since the next
major release of Octave (which I co-maintain) will build-depend on it.
So I am willing to help with the upcoming transition (once the package
is in experimental), and in general with any specific difficulty that
you may have encountered. Don't hesitate to ask me.
By the way, I see that there are now two sundials repositories on
alioth (sundials.git and sundials_dima_kogan.git). Which one is the
right one? Some clean-up would probably be warranted.
Cheers,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
Reply to: