Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.05.2017, 16:52 +0000 schrieb Nico Schlömer:
> Alright, excellent, so we all agree to put it in a new repo.
>
> Would anyone open one and import the VTK7 from the vtk6 repo?
I'll do it, but currently I'm on a volume limited Internet connection
(this should change in a few days), so it will take a few days until I
can implement it.
BTW: Nico I, ve seen that you changed back to not using system-provided
versions for GL2P, LIBPROJ4, and GLEW. Could you be a bit more
specific in the changelog about why you did this?
Many thanks,
Gert
>
> Cheers,
> Nico
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org> wrote:
> > Hi Nico, I was not quite explicit. I meant to have in a separate
> > branch.
> > But it is not so critical.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Anton
> >
> >
> > 2017-05-08 18:28 GMT+02:00 Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer@gmail.com>
> > :
> > > Thanks Gert for the comment.
> > >
> > > I committed it to the vtk6 repo after consulting with the Anton,
> > see [1].
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Nico
> > >
> > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=0;bug=81025
> > 4;msg=45
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:24 PM Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello Nico,
> > >>
> > >> I've seen that you have started packaging vtk 7.1 within the
> > vtk6 tree,
> > >> effectively targeting at replacing vtk 6.3.
> > >>
> > >> Please don't do this, we might have to package vtk-6.3 and vtk-
> > 7.1 in
> > >> parallel (at least for some time). For further details see
> > >>
> > >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2017/04/msg00009.html
> > >>
> > >> So just like we did with vtk6 vs. vtk5 at least I would prefer
> > to
> > >> package vtk7 in a separate repository.
> > >>
> > >> Many thanks,
> > >> Gert
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >