Re: Bug#877700: RM: pandas [arm64 armel armhf mips mips64el mipsel s390x] -- ROM; Some build time tests are failing on specific architectures
OK folks, if nobody insists I'll do the following
1. proceed as I suggested here:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2017/10/msg00001.html
2. Upload after migrating the package to Debian Science as
we previously agreed upon.
Is there anybody who is no happy about this?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:00:04PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:23:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Package: ftp.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi ftpmasters,
> >
> > as discussed in detail on Debian Science list[1] please remove pandas
> > for the said architectures to enable lowering severity of bug #877419
> > and let the package migrate to testing at least for the working
> > architectures.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your ftpmaster work
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2017/10/msg00009.html
>
> The dak command used in this email is misleading.
>
> -A, --no-arch-all-rdeps Do not report breaking arch:all packages
> or Build-Depends-Indep
>
> Without -A you get:
> # Broken Depends:
> pandas: python-pandas
> python3-pandas
>
> And pandas is not a leaf package.
>
> The removal you are requesting would make pandas no longer available on
> these architectures.
>
> Due to that that you would also remove all binary-any reverse
> (build) dependencies.
>
> As an example, testing migration of statsmodels is currently blocked by
> missing builds due to non-installable pandas on the architectures where
> you want to remove pandas.
>
>
> What causes these FTBFS to appear is likely related to:
>
> pandas (0.20.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> ...
> - enabled back all the tests for now
> ...
> -- Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:00:59 -0400
>
>
> This sounds as if pandas previously needed some fiddling with the tests,
> and doing that again is likely a better option.[1]
>
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
> [1] ideally each test failure should be debugged properly,
> but as short-term hack disabling some tests would be an option
>
> --
>
> "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
> of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
> "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
> Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: