Re: Packaging new upstream for sundials

Hi Dima

How much of the packaging have you done? I've almost done 2.6-2.6.2, the main problem was trying to make octave-sundials multiarch (given the build system used upstream is a hacky matlab script). I've got multiarch working for the rest of sundials, and have added pkg-config files.

James

On 9 October 2016 at 19:24, Dima Kogan <dkogan@debian.org> wrote:

Hi.

I'm packaging the new 2.7.0 release of sundials to update our very old
2.5.0 packages. Upstream has removed (possibly temporarily) the matlab
toolbox:

http://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/sundials-software

Thus a packaging of 2.7.0 would remove the octave-sundials package. Any
objections to this?

dima

Don't send me files in proprietary formats (.doc(x), .xls, .ppt etc.). It isn't good enough for Tim Berners-Lee, and it isn't good enough for me either. For more information visit http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html.

Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
- Henrik Tikkanen

If you're not messing with your sanity, you're not having fun.
- James Tocknell

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice; In practice, there is.