Re: How to deal with clapack - is it (or a replacement) packaged
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:00:42AM +0200, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 21/04/16 21:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>See this blog post for a good reasoning:
> >>http://nicolas.limare.net/pro/notes/2014/10/31_cblas_clapack_lapacke/
> >
> >While this sounds convincing I have spotted some other potential
> >packaging target using clapack and may be the porting work is more
> >effort than just another package?
>
> I could have a look. Probably next week.
Cool, that would be very helpful.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: